Mumbai is where nothing prevents us from getting the opportunity to work — not bomb impacts, not downpours, not downpours that would push some other city down to the brink of collapse. Next morning, while the city resembles a calamity has hit, which it has, the greater part of us have swung up to work, swapping war stories of how we overcame the chances to get in.
The much mythical "soul of Mumbai" is seen and felt by every one of us who live here: The thoughtfulness of outsiders, the cleverness of co-travelers, the "this too will pass" demeanor, the swagger of overcoming the bombs, the components — knowing we have no other for help however each other. No legislature, no framework, no foundation works for us, yet we have smiled and borne it. Be that as it may, this year has been the straw that crushed this present camel's spirit. My soul of Mumbai has gone for a climb, and I, as the greater part of my co-nationals, am fairly put out by the sheer insensitive clumsiness of the neighborhood experts, state specialists, and the focal government towards the city that works its heart out to nourish the exchequer.
At the center of this issue is the topic of who runs Mumbai. What's more, the appropriate response reveals to you why Mumbai is in the chaos that it is. There are numerous players in charge of the unpleasant conditions in which we live and work. Filthy streets, potholes, heaping up of refuse, flooding sewage, poor lighting, and so forth. Sadly, none of these players are responsible.
The first of these players is the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), the specialist that should convey essential metro enhancements to the number of inhabitants in Mumbai. In any case, it's an organization that is stuck in a period twist around 1950s. Its approaches and measures potentially functioned admirably for a city of around 4.06 million individuals in 1965. However, today, the number of inhabitants in Mumbai is assessed as being more than 21 million individuals, and the BMC can't adapt.
The second layer of issues is the chosen governing body of Mumbai. The corporator has administrative powers yet its execution stays with the unaccountable civil servant. In a perfect world, a proactive lawmaking body should have the capacity to roll out a few improvements. In any case, given that the chose gathering for Mumbai is for the most part nearby strongmen who are occupied with expanding their own capacity base, this suspicion of "good authoritative aim" separates. The leader is chosen by the authoritative committee, and if s/he has a part past cutting strips, it has not been clarified.
The third layer is the Municipal Commissioner of Mumbai, an IAS officer named by the Chief Minister of Maharashtra. The BMC chief is in charge of every city comfort: From getting tenders out to settling streets to guaranteeing that rubbish is gathered. As a result, the BMC chief is the CEO of Mumbai.
At that point there are progressive state governments who drain Mumbai however do close to nothing. This set up is a comfortable club for the individuals who run it. It works for them. It doesn't for the general population who live here.
Mumbai is frayed incalculable. It is held together by petition, greatness, and band help. What's more, except if we have some purposeful activity on the city, Mumbai will disintegrate into nothingness.
To keep this from happening, we needn't bother with more band helps, yet an interruption of the comfortable club that runs Mumbai. What we require is a CEO for Mumbai, responsible to the general population of the city. Not an IAS officer who gets his/her benefits regardless of what they do. We require chose authorities who will work with the administration to guarantee that the trash is gathered, streets are perfect, healing centers are working. What's more, we require natives who take a more dynamic enthusiasm for the city. It is likewise time to inquire as to whether the BMC should be isolated into littler enterprises to wind up more productive. Each with a straightforwardly chose leader who has official forces to convey change in the new (littler) city. At the present time, the nearby government in Mumbai resembles a dark gap of organization, draining all life out of the city. Possibly the most ideal approach to spare the city is to separate the BMC and supplant it with something from the 21st Century.
Today, as the Gokhale street over extension that interfaces eastern and western parts of the thickly populated suburb of Andheri crumbled on the tracks, prompting movement mayhem and conveying Mumbai to a moderate creep, one needs to make this inquiry: Who is responsible for this? It isn't that downpours are unforeseen. It isn't obscure that squeaking foundation in the city should be updated. Is anything but a riddle that drains should be cleaned and streets should be settled. However, it is a similar story of work not being finished. It isn't done in light of the fact that there isn't any punishment for non-execution.
We continue looking at adjusting the American presidential framework for the nation. We would be in an ideal situation acquiring the expansive structure of how their urban communities are run. Chosen authorities with official forces to convey genuine change.
0 Post a Comment: